Since the release of the Durham Report on May 15, 2023 large Western media outlets have for the most part done nothing but criticise the report for its so-called inability to justify its four-year investigation into FBI misconduct and that the fact that only three names were mentioned for criminal prosecution, with two being thrown out of court, shows that the investigation had little evidence to justify its inquiry to begin with.
I think it may be of some interest citing something the americans4innovation have pointed out; Namely that both the CIA and the FBI were, as I would express it, overviewed by the MI6 from around 1946.
The British side thus, perhaps, having something like almost full transparency behind the scenes in what ought to be a secret and protected background for US national security.
But I guess it could have been the case, with the CIA, that there was a give and take, since the British had older networks.
Since a4i in connection with what happened during an important phase of the rise of the angloamerican establishment in 1909 have also exposed how both the MI6 and MI5 from the start recruited journalists as agents in the service of that establishment.
The mission of the related conference of the Pilgrim Society in 1909 was to argue for journalist's to be the governments voices.
Today, with the alternate media we are, sort of, used to that being the case but the fact that this was so openly stated in 1909 may not have been known to many of us without the work of a4i.
A4i has also pointed out other remarkable circumstances, in the context of 600 lawyers playing some kind of influential role.
I got the impression that a4i meant it constituted an instrument of the deep state.
A4i wrote that they were related to a firm CERCO that was somehow under Britains umbrella.
I havent seen any comments or critique against a4i so I dont know.
But it sounded as if it was legal for those in question to lie to court.
In the present article you bring up, at least nominally, some cases of individuals punished for lying to court but a4i cited it as a relatively recent addition to the law.
In the recent series titled 'The French Connection: The Knights of Malta, the Scottish Rite & the Rise of the Mafia Brotherhoods' the connection between organised crime and the elites major secret societies is exposed and the long historical period of developments that preceeded it.
To me it doesnt sound like a4i would necessarily have to be wrong even about the cited remarkable background.
On the altmedia, some of us, already ridicule the so called Rules based Order, but further down the rabbit hole things may be even weirder?
Absolutely and immediately but sadly our party will NEVER and I mean EVER do anything! We have a chance once President Trump puts his hand on the Bible 🙏🏻🇺🇸
Incredible coverage of this important reveal. Many know now and the number growing. Did I hear that Trump had to retrieve his shoes after the attempt on his life? That sounds familiar doesn't it?
I'm just still reeling from the non-reaction across the media spaces to the FBI's launch of its own autonomous foreign policy back in February. Check out this articlette in The TransAtlantic…
Hi William thanks for your response. I completely agree with you that the intelligence agencies have not been created to protect the people and I thought that would have been evident if you are familiar with my work, I have written about this in several pieces, including on the origins of the FBI here https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-origins-of-americas-secret-police-c7d and on the origins of MI5 here https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/operation-gladio-how-nato-conducted. Clearly the intelligence agencies were not created to protect the people but that is how they have been legally justified and they have been in violation of their charter so it is not irrelevant to bring this up. The Horowitz Report had already put the FBI under pressure, the Durham Report if people know how to use this can add pressure to make a serious reform of the FBI, this is the point. Bringing up stuff that happened over 100 years ago is not going to back a reform of the FBI today.
??? William you are free to unsubscribe at any time to my substack. I consider myself a writer and researcher. If you are not interested in facts and data you can go back to reading short sentences on Twitter.
Yes!!!
I think it may be of some interest citing something the americans4innovation have pointed out; Namely that both the CIA and the FBI were, as I would express it, overviewed by the MI6 from around 1946.
The British side thus, perhaps, having something like almost full transparency behind the scenes in what ought to be a secret and protected background for US national security.
But I guess it could have been the case, with the CIA, that there was a give and take, since the British had older networks.
Since a4i in connection with what happened during an important phase of the rise of the angloamerican establishment in 1909 have also exposed how both the MI6 and MI5 from the start recruited journalists as agents in the service of that establishment.
The mission of the related conference of the Pilgrim Society in 1909 was to argue for journalist's to be the governments voices.
Today, with the alternate media we are, sort of, used to that being the case but the fact that this was so openly stated in 1909 may not have been known to many of us without the work of a4i.
A4i has also pointed out other remarkable circumstances, in the context of 600 lawyers playing some kind of influential role.
I got the impression that a4i meant it constituted an instrument of the deep state.
A4i wrote that they were related to a firm CERCO that was somehow under Britains umbrella.
I havent seen any comments or critique against a4i so I dont know.
But it sounded as if it was legal for those in question to lie to court.
In the present article you bring up, at least nominally, some cases of individuals punished for lying to court but a4i cited it as a relatively recent addition to the law.
In the recent series titled 'The French Connection: The Knights of Malta, the Scottish Rite & the Rise of the Mafia Brotherhoods' the connection between organised crime and the elites major secret societies is exposed and the long historical period of developments that preceeded it.
To me it doesnt sound like a4i would necessarily have to be wrong even about the cited remarkable background.
On the altmedia, some of us, already ridicule the so called Rules based Order, but further down the rabbit hole things may be even weirder?
Very long read, is a good read.
Absolutely and immediately but sadly our party will NEVER and I mean EVER do anything! We have a chance once President Trump puts his hand on the Bible 🙏🏻🇺🇸
Incredible coverage of this important reveal. Many know now and the number growing. Did I hear that Trump had to retrieve his shoes after the attempt on his life? That sounds familiar doesn't it?
I completely agree with you on this as well.
I'm just still reeling from the non-reaction across the media spaces to the FBI's launch of its own autonomous foreign policy back in February. Check out this articlette in The TransAtlantic…
https://thetransatlantic.substack.com/p/so-the-fbi-has-a-foreign-policy-now?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Hi William thanks for your response. I completely agree with you that the intelligence agencies have not been created to protect the people and I thought that would have been evident if you are familiar with my work, I have written about this in several pieces, including on the origins of the FBI here https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-origins-of-americas-secret-police-c7d and on the origins of MI5 here https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/operation-gladio-how-nato-conducted. Clearly the intelligence agencies were not created to protect the people but that is how they have been legally justified and they have been in violation of their charter so it is not irrelevant to bring this up. The Horowitz Report had already put the FBI under pressure, the Durham Report if people know how to use this can add pressure to make a serious reform of the FBI, this is the point. Bringing up stuff that happened over 100 years ago is not going to back a reform of the FBI today.
??? William you are free to unsubscribe at any time to my substack. I consider myself a writer and researcher. If you are not interested in facts and data you can go back to reading short sentences on Twitter.
Glad to hear it was a misunderstanding William, thank you for clarifying.