Why is it I always feel smarter and better informed after reading, probably because I am. Thanks and ready to tackle your book, The Empire on Which the Black Sun Never Set! God Bless!!!
Ms. Chung, pardon me but I am Sicilian. I know my heritage. I know the stories, there was not one man who formed the Sicilian Mafia. Cosa
Nostra (translated: our things, our gang), when you say G. Mezzani, started the mafia, it was not just one person. It was several. My mother is of Sicilian decent. My bloodline goes way back. Again, when speaking of the mafia, which is still heavily present today, I would make sure you have all the “true” evidence, if you can find it. Italians don’t give anything away. Even the truth.
Hi Lisa, I think you have missed the point of this series. This series is making the case that the mafia did not form naturally of its own accord but was given its power and secret society laws from the several institutions I mention throughout this series. The Sicilian Mafia is modeled off of Mazzini's Young Italy but also from secret societies that existed before even Mazzini, this is larger than Mazzini, and even though Mazzini is the one to instigate the process, he is not the mastermind or creator from that standpoint. As for the Cosa Nostra, I am not saying that Macheca formed the Cosa Nostra, that makes no sense since the Cosa Nostra was formed well after Macheca lived. The point to bringing up his name as the founder of what would form the American Mafia is again to make the point of the circles he was found active in. Again, Macheca is not the mastermind or creator of the American Mafia from this standpoint, but it is most worthy to bring him up as the first organiser of what would later form the American Mafia and how this was implicated in its support for the Confederacy. The Mafia was never its own institution but was beholden to the Knights of Malta as is clearly shown in the quote from the Picayune New Orleans newspaper. Everything I have stated is well backed up in this series which you are not even making a case against but rather that your Italian heritage apparently makes you an expert in secret societies surrounding Mazzini....which I would beg to differ otherwise the Italians wouldn't have been his dupes in his false fight for Italian independence which he instead used to create a short-lived dictatorship of Rome under a Triumvirate for a Third Rome.
Sure, I see all the information you are giving me, Cynthia, but when you live it and hear the stories, we are not going to see eye to eye no matter what, as my Italian family is from Italy, not amerika. I am going to bow out of this discussion.
As far as the knights of Malta, there was nothing said to us kids growing up…this is 70’s-80’s. The knights of Malta is under Catholicism. Part of the Templar, and Swiss Guard, but no one mentions how tight the Italians and Swiss, truly are…
I agree that there is a close relationship between the Italians and Swiss from the standpoint of the Venetian Oligarchy and the Genoese Oligarchy, this is also why the Corsican Mafia (which would also have a Mazzini inspired Young Corsica) was the other region to form a Mafia Brotherhood, I think this is no coincidence. Also the Swiss were involved in introducing the Scottish Rite into America (as I discuss in this paper). I hope to further expand on this when I do end up looking further into the roots of the Corsican Mafia.
It is a constant problem in the "deep state" narrative to know what peoples motivations truly were, who really knew what they were doing, and who were just compliant stooges, or "useful idiots". Though Jackson was influenced by Burr, we cannot presume that he therefore shared all of Burrs anti-populist intentions, because by all other accounts, Jackson seems a natural populist. Likewise with Teddy Roosevelt and many others who were secretly influenced by British Intelligence. How do we explain unremarkable people suddenly bursting into anti-humanist activity, other than hypnosis, or maybe demonic possession? Look at Dr. Fauci in our own time. The man has no idea that he has done anything wrong, he believes he is a "great man" being unfairly maligned, but he was clearly manipulated, or "groomed", by unknown forces to provide state funding and resources toward a diabolical program for forty years. The solution posits a much darker spiritual force from outside, exhibiting uncanny insight for picking just the right move or the right people, and the arrogance to deconstruct entire stable societies. Who in their right mind thinks Masonic demonism, or youth movements, or programs of "assassination" are a noble idea? It seems that mankind is not alone in his moral universe, an angelic/demonic realm of life was created with us, and seems to be acting feverishly to save or to ruin mankind. Tragically, the unaccountable elites of our world are fascinated by this demonic power; they seek it, pursue it, and cultivate it. But Heaven is both mercy and justice, and God has made clear that no evil elite, no matter how powerful on earth, will end up happy or fulfilled, their destination is a lake of eternal fire. The Devil knows this, so his ultimate motive is to steer us, not merely to a productive end for elites, but ultimately to the betrayal and self-destruction of all Creation.
I do have a question. Jackson was the protege of Aaron Burr who worked throughout his career to break up the US. Yet, when the Nullification Crisis came, with southern states threatening secession over the tariff, Jackson as President worked hard to find compromises to prevent the secessionist movement from acting. Is this an inconsistency in the narrative and how can it be explained?
Why is it I always feel smarter and better informed after reading, probably because I am. Thanks and ready to tackle your book, The Empire on Which the Black Sun Never Set! God Bless!!!
History repeats. A manufactured crisis, a crusade response that always goes way too far.
Ms. Chung, pardon me but I am Sicilian. I know my heritage. I know the stories, there was not one man who formed the Sicilian Mafia. Cosa
Nostra (translated: our things, our gang), when you say G. Mezzani, started the mafia, it was not just one person. It was several. My mother is of Sicilian decent. My bloodline goes way back. Again, when speaking of the mafia, which is still heavily present today, I would make sure you have all the “true” evidence, if you can find it. Italians don’t give anything away. Even the truth.
Hi Lisa, I think you have missed the point of this series. This series is making the case that the mafia did not form naturally of its own accord but was given its power and secret society laws from the several institutions I mention throughout this series. The Sicilian Mafia is modeled off of Mazzini's Young Italy but also from secret societies that existed before even Mazzini, this is larger than Mazzini, and even though Mazzini is the one to instigate the process, he is not the mastermind or creator from that standpoint. As for the Cosa Nostra, I am not saying that Macheca formed the Cosa Nostra, that makes no sense since the Cosa Nostra was formed well after Macheca lived. The point to bringing up his name as the founder of what would form the American Mafia is again to make the point of the circles he was found active in. Again, Macheca is not the mastermind or creator of the American Mafia from this standpoint, but it is most worthy to bring him up as the first organiser of what would later form the American Mafia and how this was implicated in its support for the Confederacy. The Mafia was never its own institution but was beholden to the Knights of Malta as is clearly shown in the quote from the Picayune New Orleans newspaper. Everything I have stated is well backed up in this series which you are not even making a case against but rather that your Italian heritage apparently makes you an expert in secret societies surrounding Mazzini....which I would beg to differ otherwise the Italians wouldn't have been his dupes in his false fight for Italian independence which he instead used to create a short-lived dictatorship of Rome under a Triumvirate for a Third Rome.
Sure, I see all the information you are giving me, Cynthia, but when you live it and hear the stories, we are not going to see eye to eye no matter what, as my Italian family is from Italy, not amerika. I am going to bow out of this discussion.
As far as the knights of Malta, there was nothing said to us kids growing up…this is 70’s-80’s. The knights of Malta is under Catholicism. Part of the Templar, and Swiss Guard, but no one mentions how tight the Italians and Swiss, truly are…
I agree that there is a close relationship between the Italians and Swiss from the standpoint of the Venetian Oligarchy and the Genoese Oligarchy, this is also why the Corsican Mafia (which would also have a Mazzini inspired Young Corsica) was the other region to form a Mafia Brotherhood, I think this is no coincidence. Also the Swiss were involved in introducing the Scottish Rite into America (as I discuss in this paper). I hope to further expand on this when I do end up looking further into the roots of the Corsican Mafia.
Thank you 😊for all of your hard work and information 👍🏻😊
Another tour de force chapter by Cynthia and Matt and Anton! The dark veils are lifting....!
It is a constant problem in the "deep state" narrative to know what peoples motivations truly were, who really knew what they were doing, and who were just compliant stooges, or "useful idiots". Though Jackson was influenced by Burr, we cannot presume that he therefore shared all of Burrs anti-populist intentions, because by all other accounts, Jackson seems a natural populist. Likewise with Teddy Roosevelt and many others who were secretly influenced by British Intelligence. How do we explain unremarkable people suddenly bursting into anti-humanist activity, other than hypnosis, or maybe demonic possession? Look at Dr. Fauci in our own time. The man has no idea that he has done anything wrong, he believes he is a "great man" being unfairly maligned, but he was clearly manipulated, or "groomed", by unknown forces to provide state funding and resources toward a diabolical program for forty years. The solution posits a much darker spiritual force from outside, exhibiting uncanny insight for picking just the right move or the right people, and the arrogance to deconstruct entire stable societies. Who in their right mind thinks Masonic demonism, or youth movements, or programs of "assassination" are a noble idea? It seems that mankind is not alone in his moral universe, an angelic/demonic realm of life was created with us, and seems to be acting feverishly to save or to ruin mankind. Tragically, the unaccountable elites of our world are fascinated by this demonic power; they seek it, pursue it, and cultivate it. But Heaven is both mercy and justice, and God has made clear that no evil elite, no matter how powerful on earth, will end up happy or fulfilled, their destination is a lake of eternal fire. The Devil knows this, so his ultimate motive is to steer us, not merely to a productive end for elites, but ultimately to the betrayal and self-destruction of all Creation.
I do have a question. Jackson was the protege of Aaron Burr who worked throughout his career to break up the US. Yet, when the Nullification Crisis came, with southern states threatening secession over the tariff, Jackson as President worked hard to find compromises to prevent the secessionist movement from acting. Is this an inconsistency in the narrative and how can it be explained?