Why is it I always feel smarter and better informed after reading, probably because I am. Thanks and ready to tackle your book, The Empire on Which the Black Sun Never Set! God Bless!!!
highly recommend the book along with Matt's 4-Volume "Clash Between The Two America's." I'd also recommend how the Nation Was Won and Anton Chaitkin's soon to be 3-Volume "Who We Are."
Ya lo advertía Monseñor Claudio Sanahuja, de Argentina ) seguramente no el único ( , Principados y Potestades. Desconozco el simil de Potestad, en lenguas habladas en el serpenteante Rio Amarillo, ni si Confucio la tenía en su Léxico o Diccionario. Aún así, un artículo de gran tamaño.
Se despide un seguidor intermitente de su trabajo.
Could I perhaps bother you both with taking a look at that comment here?
Here is the full comment
The British Empire's future was at stake if the Rothschilds and other 'so called' international bankers would be too much into the win-win type of collaboration with Germany in the eyes of the British. I wrote a mail to Mathew Ehret about this topic so I will not repeat it in an otherwise unavoidably very long comment here.
I dont know if Mathew got my mail and it would be good to know if he did.
But this time I have a different problem to bring up. And it is about the purge of republican freemasonry that Mathew has mentioned.
Antony Sutton in 'America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones' has explained the Hegelian thinking of that secret order and since it was founded around 1833 and is supposed to have originated from Germany the year before, this happens to have taken place in the middle of the period of the mentioned purge between 1826 to 1840.
I have suspected before that the British elites might have been involved in the process that led to the creation of the Skull and Bones but this piece of info about the purge and the time when it happened was new to me.
According to Sutton that order was very much like an anglophile grouping as I interpreted Sutton.
Thus not totally dissimilar to the much later Rhodes context.
And its strategy although associated with Hegel to me seems to be qualitatively related to Britains power of balance strategy.
And not just Britain's but if I have understood the articles written by many in the Larouche-circle, this strategy was the mode of operation of a much older oligarchy from which Britain and also the current US have inherited the thinking behind it.
Venice and those older oligarchies before them could perhaps be said to have practised Hegelian dialectics long before Hegel?
Further I am not suggesting Hegel had the same evil intentions as those other power of balance oligarchies.
But I am not defending Hegel either, I just dont feel enough read into his works to have a well-founded opinion.
If the British masons in the middle of that purge also launched the organisation leading to the formation of the Skull and Bones, surely they might have been hiding behind the cover of a purported German origin.
It is remarkable that there are too secret (originally) anglophile circles both having a similar strategy and not well explained by court historians, that motivates both camps to support extremist gangs and countergangs like nazis and trotskists.
As near as I can tell with my research - The Venetian Black Nobility fomented the Catholic-Protestant wars in the 1600's and fled to Amsterdam and then fled from there a century later into what is now The CITY OF LONDON - so no surprise that connection can be made with the purging of the Scotts Rite Freemasonry in the US - which later formed the FBI, the OSS and eventually the CIA - it's all one big tangled web that traces to Britain, but Venice, Amsterdam, The Dutch Netherlands and Swiss elements are tangled within that massive international syndicate web and all of that traces to the Black Nobility which has family heritage ties with the Roman Senate in Roman times. Within that connection is the Viking/Pirate heritage that formed the Dutch and British East Indies Company.
Ms. Chung, pardon me but I am Sicilian. I know my heritage. I know the stories, there was not one man who formed the Sicilian Mafia. Cosa
Nostra (translated: our things, our gang), when you say G. Mezzani, started the mafia, it was not just one person. It was several. My mother is of Sicilian decent. My bloodline goes way back. Again, when speaking of the mafia, which is still heavily present today, I would make sure you have all the “true” evidence, if you can find it. Italians don’t give anything away. Even the truth.
Hi Lisa, I think you have missed the point of this series. This series is making the case that the mafia did not form naturally of its own accord but was given its power and secret society laws from the several institutions I mention throughout this series. The Sicilian Mafia is modeled off of Mazzini's Young Italy but also from secret societies that existed before even Mazzini, this is larger than Mazzini, and even though Mazzini is the one to instigate the process, he is not the mastermind or creator from that standpoint. As for the Cosa Nostra, I am not saying that Macheca formed the Cosa Nostra, that makes no sense since the Cosa Nostra was formed well after Macheca lived. The point to bringing up his name as the founder of what would form the American Mafia is again to make the point of the circles he was found active in. Again, Macheca is not the mastermind or creator of the American Mafia from this standpoint, but it is most worthy to bring him up as the first organiser of what would later form the American Mafia and how this was implicated in its support for the Confederacy. The Mafia was never its own institution but was beholden to the Knights of Malta as is clearly shown in the quote from the Picayune New Orleans newspaper. Everything I have stated is well backed up in this series which you are not even making a case against but rather that your Italian heritage apparently makes you an expert in secret societies surrounding Mazzini....which I would beg to differ otherwise the Italians wouldn't have been his dupes in his false fight for Italian independence which he instead used to create a short-lived dictatorship of Rome under a Triumvirate for a Third Rome.
Sure, I see all the information you are giving me, Cynthia, but when you live it and hear the stories, we are not going to see eye to eye no matter what, as my Italian family is from Italy, not amerika. I am going to bow out of this discussion.
As far as the knights of Malta, there was nothing said to us kids growing up…this is 70’s-80’s. The knights of Malta is under Catholicism. Part of the Templar, and Swiss Guard, but no one mentions how tight the Italians and Swiss, truly are…
I agree that there is a close relationship between the Italians and Swiss from the standpoint of the Venetian Oligarchy and the Genoese Oligarchy, this is also why the Corsican Mafia (which would also have a Mazzini inspired Young Corsica) was the other region to form a Mafia Brotherhood, I think this is no coincidence. Also the Swiss were involved in introducing the Scottish Rite into America (as I discuss in this paper). I hope to further expand on this when I do end up looking further into the roots of the Corsican Mafia.
Part of the Black Nobility. The Knights of Malta run the Knights of Columbus under the Roman Catholic Church Umbrella. I personally know the mafia family that runs that organization along the west coast. The best book that speaks to what you are conveying is Brothers in Blood - The Rise of the Criminal Brotherhoods by David Leon Chandler which covers The Garduna, Camorra, Sicillian Mafia, Stoppaglieri, American Mafia - the false mafia (front for the real thing that the FBI termed Costa Nostra and The Unione Corse.
Good to see you hooking up with Kris Milligan's Roundtable - enjoyed the podcast this week, also - is this information "The French Connection" going to be included in an upcoming book between the two of you (Cynthia?) - also (part II) do you have footnotes and resources I can tap into (other books I can read on this subject matter?). I'd love to dive deeper on this as it supports an ongoing book manuscript I have been working on for years.
It is a constant problem in the "deep state" narrative to know what peoples motivations truly were, who really knew what they were doing, and who were just compliant stooges, or "useful idiots". Though Jackson was influenced by Burr, we cannot presume that he therefore shared all of Burrs anti-populist intentions, because by all other accounts, Jackson seems a natural populist. Likewise with Teddy Roosevelt and many others who were secretly influenced by British Intelligence. How do we explain unremarkable people suddenly bursting into anti-humanist activity, other than hypnosis, or maybe demonic possession? Look at Dr. Fauci in our own time. The man has no idea that he has done anything wrong, he believes he is a "great man" being unfairly maligned, but he was clearly manipulated, or "groomed", by unknown forces to provide state funding and resources toward a diabolical program for forty years. The solution posits a much darker spiritual force from outside, exhibiting uncanny insight for picking just the right move or the right people, and the arrogance to deconstruct entire stable societies. Who in their right mind thinks Masonic demonism, or youth movements, or programs of "assassination" are a noble idea? It seems that mankind is not alone in his moral universe, an angelic/demonic realm of life was created with us, and seems to be acting feverishly to save or to ruin mankind. Tragically, the unaccountable elites of our world are fascinated by this demonic power; they seek it, pursue it, and cultivate it. But Heaven is both mercy and justice, and God has made clear that no evil elite, no matter how powerful on earth, will end up happy or fulfilled, their destination is a lake of eternal fire. The Devil knows this, so his ultimate motive is to steer us, not merely to a productive end for elites, but ultimately to the betrayal and self-destruction of all Creation.
I do have a question. Jackson was the protege of Aaron Burr who worked throughout his career to break up the US. Yet, when the Nullification Crisis came, with southern states threatening secession over the tariff, Jackson as President worked hard to find compromises to prevent the secessionist movement from acting. Is this an inconsistency in the narrative and how can it be explained?
Why is it I always feel smarter and better informed after reading, probably because I am. Thanks and ready to tackle your book, The Empire on Which the Black Sun Never Set! God Bless!!!
highly recommend the book along with Matt's 4-Volume "Clash Between The Two America's." I'd also recommend how the Nation Was Won and Anton Chaitkin's soon to be 3-Volume "Who We Are."
Ya lo advertía Monseñor Claudio Sanahuja, de Argentina ) seguramente no el único ( , Principados y Potestades. Desconozco el simil de Potestad, en lenguas habladas en el serpenteante Rio Amarillo, ni si Confucio la tenía en su Léxico o Diccionario. Aún así, un artículo de gran tamaño.
Se despide un seguidor intermitente de su trabajo.
Godo Manuel
Sur de Chile
Some technical problem made my comment on september 24, not stick under Mathew's article:
https://canadianpatriot.org/2024/08/31/the-royal-blood-sacrifice-of-prince-albert-victor-and-why-the-oligarchy-hates-the-jews/
Could I perhaps bother you both with taking a look at that comment here?
Here is the full comment
The British Empire's future was at stake if the Rothschilds and other 'so called' international bankers would be too much into the win-win type of collaboration with Germany in the eyes of the British. I wrote a mail to Mathew Ehret about this topic so I will not repeat it in an otherwise unavoidably very long comment here.
I dont know if Mathew got my mail and it would be good to know if he did.
But this time I have a different problem to bring up. And it is about the purge of republican freemasonry that Mathew has mentioned.
Antony Sutton in 'America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones' has explained the Hegelian thinking of that secret order and since it was founded around 1833 and is supposed to have originated from Germany the year before, this happens to have taken place in the middle of the period of the mentioned purge between 1826 to 1840.
I have suspected before that the British elites might have been involved in the process that led to the creation of the Skull and Bones but this piece of info about the purge and the time when it happened was new to me.
According to Sutton that order was very much like an anglophile grouping as I interpreted Sutton.
Thus not totally dissimilar to the much later Rhodes context.
And its strategy although associated with Hegel to me seems to be qualitatively related to Britains power of balance strategy.
And not just Britain's but if I have understood the articles written by many in the Larouche-circle, this strategy was the mode of operation of a much older oligarchy from which Britain and also the current US have inherited the thinking behind it.
Venice and those older oligarchies before them could perhaps be said to have practised Hegelian dialectics long before Hegel?
Further I am not suggesting Hegel had the same evil intentions as those other power of balance oligarchies.
But I am not defending Hegel either, I just dont feel enough read into his works to have a well-founded opinion.
If the British masons in the middle of that purge also launched the organisation leading to the formation of the Skull and Bones, surely they might have been hiding behind the cover of a purported German origin.
It is remarkable that there are too secret (originally) anglophile circles both having a similar strategy and not well explained by court historians, that motivates both camps to support extremist gangs and countergangs like nazis and trotskists.
As near as I can tell with my research - The Venetian Black Nobility fomented the Catholic-Protestant wars in the 1600's and fled to Amsterdam and then fled from there a century later into what is now The CITY OF LONDON - so no surprise that connection can be made with the purging of the Scotts Rite Freemasonry in the US - which later formed the FBI, the OSS and eventually the CIA - it's all one big tangled web that traces to Britain, but Venice, Amsterdam, The Dutch Netherlands and Swiss elements are tangled within that massive international syndicate web and all of that traces to the Black Nobility which has family heritage ties with the Roman Senate in Roman times. Within that connection is the Viking/Pirate heritage that formed the Dutch and British East Indies Company.
Ms. Chung, pardon me but I am Sicilian. I know my heritage. I know the stories, there was not one man who formed the Sicilian Mafia. Cosa
Nostra (translated: our things, our gang), when you say G. Mezzani, started the mafia, it was not just one person. It was several. My mother is of Sicilian decent. My bloodline goes way back. Again, when speaking of the mafia, which is still heavily present today, I would make sure you have all the “true” evidence, if you can find it. Italians don’t give anything away. Even the truth.
Hi Lisa, I think you have missed the point of this series. This series is making the case that the mafia did not form naturally of its own accord but was given its power and secret society laws from the several institutions I mention throughout this series. The Sicilian Mafia is modeled off of Mazzini's Young Italy but also from secret societies that existed before even Mazzini, this is larger than Mazzini, and even though Mazzini is the one to instigate the process, he is not the mastermind or creator from that standpoint. As for the Cosa Nostra, I am not saying that Macheca formed the Cosa Nostra, that makes no sense since the Cosa Nostra was formed well after Macheca lived. The point to bringing up his name as the founder of what would form the American Mafia is again to make the point of the circles he was found active in. Again, Macheca is not the mastermind or creator of the American Mafia from this standpoint, but it is most worthy to bring him up as the first organiser of what would later form the American Mafia and how this was implicated in its support for the Confederacy. The Mafia was never its own institution but was beholden to the Knights of Malta as is clearly shown in the quote from the Picayune New Orleans newspaper. Everything I have stated is well backed up in this series which you are not even making a case against but rather that your Italian heritage apparently makes you an expert in secret societies surrounding Mazzini....which I would beg to differ otherwise the Italians wouldn't have been his dupes in his false fight for Italian independence which he instead used to create a short-lived dictatorship of Rome under a Triumvirate for a Third Rome.
Sure, I see all the information you are giving me, Cynthia, but when you live it and hear the stories, we are not going to see eye to eye no matter what, as my Italian family is from Italy, not amerika. I am going to bow out of this discussion.
As far as the knights of Malta, there was nothing said to us kids growing up…this is 70’s-80’s. The knights of Malta is under Catholicism. Part of the Templar, and Swiss Guard, but no one mentions how tight the Italians and Swiss, truly are…
I agree that there is a close relationship between the Italians and Swiss from the standpoint of the Venetian Oligarchy and the Genoese Oligarchy, this is also why the Corsican Mafia (which would also have a Mazzini inspired Young Corsica) was the other region to form a Mafia Brotherhood, I think this is no coincidence. Also the Swiss were involved in introducing the Scottish Rite into America (as I discuss in this paper). I hope to further expand on this when I do end up looking further into the roots of the Corsican Mafia.
Thank you 😊for all of your hard work and information 👍🏻😊
Part of the Committee of 10 - mafia intelligence assassination type organization that was connected to the Venetian Black Nobility.
Part of the Black Nobility. The Knights of Malta run the Knights of Columbus under the Roman Catholic Church Umbrella. I personally know the mafia family that runs that organization along the west coast. The best book that speaks to what you are conveying is Brothers in Blood - The Rise of the Criminal Brotherhoods by David Leon Chandler which covers The Garduna, Camorra, Sicillian Mafia, Stoppaglieri, American Mafia - the false mafia (front for the real thing that the FBI termed Costa Nostra and The Unione Corse.
Yes, we are saying same thing. Also my family is Sicilian. I understand it! Also, did we forget the club of Rome?!?
Hey Matt,
Good to see you hooking up with Kris Milligan's Roundtable - enjoyed the podcast this week, also - is this information "The French Connection" going to be included in an upcoming book between the two of you (Cynthia?) - also (part II) do you have footnotes and resources I can tap into (other books I can read on this subject matter?). I'd love to dive deeper on this as it supports an ongoing book manuscript I have been working on for years.
Another tour de force chapter by Cynthia and Matt and Anton! The dark veils are lifting....!
It is a constant problem in the "deep state" narrative to know what peoples motivations truly were, who really knew what they were doing, and who were just compliant stooges, or "useful idiots". Though Jackson was influenced by Burr, we cannot presume that he therefore shared all of Burrs anti-populist intentions, because by all other accounts, Jackson seems a natural populist. Likewise with Teddy Roosevelt and many others who were secretly influenced by British Intelligence. How do we explain unremarkable people suddenly bursting into anti-humanist activity, other than hypnosis, or maybe demonic possession? Look at Dr. Fauci in our own time. The man has no idea that he has done anything wrong, he believes he is a "great man" being unfairly maligned, but he was clearly manipulated, or "groomed", by unknown forces to provide state funding and resources toward a diabolical program for forty years. The solution posits a much darker spiritual force from outside, exhibiting uncanny insight for picking just the right move or the right people, and the arrogance to deconstruct entire stable societies. Who in their right mind thinks Masonic demonism, or youth movements, or programs of "assassination" are a noble idea? It seems that mankind is not alone in his moral universe, an angelic/demonic realm of life was created with us, and seems to be acting feverishly to save or to ruin mankind. Tragically, the unaccountable elites of our world are fascinated by this demonic power; they seek it, pursue it, and cultivate it. But Heaven is both mercy and justice, and God has made clear that no evil elite, no matter how powerful on earth, will end up happy or fulfilled, their destination is a lake of eternal fire. The Devil knows this, so his ultimate motive is to steer us, not merely to a productive end for elites, but ultimately to the betrayal and self-destruction of all Creation.
I do have a question. Jackson was the protege of Aaron Burr who worked throughout his career to break up the US. Yet, when the Nullification Crisis came, with southern states threatening secession over the tariff, Jackson as President worked hard to find compromises to prevent the secessionist movement from acting. Is this an inconsistency in the narrative and how can it be explained?