Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Aliwister's avatar

Why is it I always feel smarter and better informed after reading, probably because I am. Thanks and ready to tackle your book, The Empire on Which the Black Sun Never Set! God Bless!!!

Peter Grafström's avatar

Some technical problem made my comment on september 24, not stick under Mathew's article:

https://canadianpatriot.org/2024/08/31/the-royal-blood-sacrifice-of-prince-albert-victor-and-why-the-oligarchy-hates-the-jews/

Could I perhaps bother you both with taking a look at that comment here?

Here is the full comment

The British Empire's future was at stake if the Rothschilds and other 'so called' international bankers would be too much into the win-win type of collaboration with Germany in the eyes of the British. I wrote a mail to Mathew Ehret about this topic so I will not repeat it in an otherwise unavoidably very long comment here.

I dont know if Mathew got my mail and it would be good to know if he did.

But this time I have a different problem to bring up. And it is about the purge of republican freemasonry that Mathew has mentioned.

Antony Sutton in 'America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones' has explained the Hegelian thinking of that secret order and since it was founded around 1833 and is supposed to have originated from Germany the year before, this happens to have taken place in the middle of the period of the mentioned purge between 1826 to 1840.

I have suspected before that the British elites might have been involved in the process that led to the creation of the Skull and Bones but this piece of info about the purge and the time when it happened was new to me.

According to Sutton that order was very much like an anglophile grouping as I interpreted Sutton.

Thus not totally dissimilar to the much later Rhodes context.

And its strategy although associated with Hegel to me seems to be qualitatively related to Britains power of balance strategy.

And not just Britain's but if I have understood the articles written by many in the Larouche-circle, this strategy was the mode of operation of a much older oligarchy from which Britain and also the current US have inherited the thinking behind it.

Venice and those older oligarchies before them could perhaps be said to have practised Hegelian dialectics long before Hegel?

Further I am not suggesting Hegel had the same evil intentions as those other power of balance oligarchies.

But I am not defending Hegel either, I just dont feel enough read into his works to have a well-founded opinion.

If the British masons in the middle of that purge also launched the organisation leading to the formation of the Skull and Bones, surely they might have been hiding behind the cover of a purported German origin.

It is remarkable that there are too secret (originally) anglophile circles both having a similar strategy and not well explained by court historians, that motivates both camps to support extremist gangs and countergangs like nazis and trotskists.

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?