I sincerely hope that 'We, the People' can achieve success in our endeavors to safeguard our intellect and fundamental liberties from this deeply troubling individual.
I sincerely hope that 'We, the People' can achieve success in our endeavors to safeguard our intellect and fundamental liberties from this deeply troubling individual.
When reflecting on the content shared by the majority of Substack writers, it becomes apparent that their emphasis tends to be solely on the alarming aspects of numerous issues. It is indeed a rarity to encounter individuals such as James Corbett, Emmanuel Pastreich, Ms. Kingston, Larry Druhall, Brave Sasha Latypova, and yourself, who actively present solutions and strategies to proactively address and mitigate these distressing circumstances. Consequently, it can be disheartening to navigate through this vast sea of information, unsure of whether there is any actionable recourse to effect meaningful change or simply traverse the challenges that inevitably arise from the actions of our influential elite. In light of these circumstances, we may even be compelled to reluctantly accept the notion that our fate is ultimately doomed.
Fantastic lecture! I recently read Wells’s World Brain and posted some thoughts from a different angle. Not claiming to be in Cynthia’s whatsoever but just thought I’d share here. Feel free to post any thoughts, criticisms.
Cynthia Chung's writings are very informative and seem well documented. But speaking of modern Ukrainian history, it would behoove her to investigate the case of Mykola Skrypnyk, ethnically Ukrainian and one of the Old Bolshevik communists, right there with Lenin and Stalin. And what happened to him and his regime in Ukraine in the early 1930s.---Skrypnyk wanted to establish a genuinely Ukrainian communist regime, state, and favored that the USSR be a federation rather than strictly centrally controlled. However, there was a resurgence of Russian supremacists led largely by Pavel Postyshev, who convinced Stalin that there was such a thing as dangerous Ukrainian "bourgeois nationalism"---the result being that there was a huge pogrom of communists with Ukrainian identity. Ukrainian language and culture were ferociously persecuted. The supremacy of Russian language and culture was established in the USSR. Along with this came the now well-known famine targeting the rural Ukrainian-identity population at large. This famine was actually part of an overall depopulation program imposed on Ukraine and parts of Russia and we think central Asia. It was the policy of what we would call the nonhuman antihuman "depopulation collective" who insisted that payment for the industrialization by "machines that make machines" had to be in grain, nothing else, not gold like Stalin originally offered. So this brought about collectivization and payment by making people die, starve in great numbers.---We maintain that if this had not happened, it is very likely that Bandera and his group would not have become fascists but would have joined Skrypnyk in building up Ukraine and would have been devoutly anti-fascist communists of Ukrainian identity. The policy of the German fascists was to allow some expression of Ukrainian identity, where the Soviet policy was no such thing, all had to be strictly Russian supremacy.---Now let's make things clear, after reading the section on Hitler in "Lightning and the Sun" by his ardent disciple so-called Savitri Devi, it became clear that Hitler's movement was actually a very extreme bizarre environmentalist movement whose ultimate goal was to exterminate most of humankind except for some tiny number of extremely warlike so-called Nordics or Germanics, who would have likely killed each other off anyway, and the planet would have been left to the "noble and innocent" animals. And Hitler did promote animal rights, even as he viewed most humans as worthless.
So there it was, another manifestation of nonhuman antihuman intelligence as driving force., what might be called the "depopulation collective". But that end result was to be in the future. Hitler was captivated by the modern racist theories first raised by one Arthur de Gobineau who, however, was not anti-Semitic and therefore not quite fitting the desirable mold. But Gobineau was an initiator of the great fundamental enmity between the Germanic-Scandinavian people against the Slavonic people, much to the overall disaster for the White race.
It's still more nuanced... from what I remember, he would have agreed with us on some things. Free speech, debate, freedom of expression. I think he would be horrified with how bad censorship, and the internet has become. big tech, fake news, guerilla skeptics, scientism, coerced jabs etc. Unless he was lying in his non fiction books.
But of course I don't agree with most of what he/they stood for, especially when talking about "civilized" vs "savages"
Mitteleuropa is German for Central Europe. The Kernpunkte conference was for a primarily German speaking audience. Matt and myself were the only English speakers. It is like specifying between Western Europe and Eastern Europe, which tend to differ greatly in cultures and politics. Or specifying between North, Central and South America.
... unfortunately i cannot attach a screenshot however "Middle Europe" is in english on the opening screen to this presentation - "Middle Europe" 'fits' between "Eastern Europe" and "Western Europe" - your argument is 'sound'
Yes, as I said the conference was a German conference and Kirsten the founder of Kernpunkte speaks in broken English and was the one who translated the poster into English, so she wrote middle instead of central but if you read the original German underneath it is clear what she meant to write, she wrote "mitteleuropa" which again is German for central europe. Instead of continuing on this very lazy line of inquiry, how about you actually look into Kernpunkte or the contents of the actual presentation.
I sincerely hope that 'We, the People' can achieve success in our endeavors to safeguard our intellect and fundamental liberties from this deeply troubling individual.
Thank you very much for providing a transcript.
Hearing impaired people are locked out of a lot of things, and I would have hated to have missed this.
I sincerely hope that 'We, the People' can achieve success in our endeavors to safeguard our intellect and fundamental liberties from this deeply troubling individual.
When reflecting on the content shared by the majority of Substack writers, it becomes apparent that their emphasis tends to be solely on the alarming aspects of numerous issues. It is indeed a rarity to encounter individuals such as James Corbett, Emmanuel Pastreich, Ms. Kingston, Larry Druhall, Brave Sasha Latypova, and yourself, who actively present solutions and strategies to proactively address and mitigate these distressing circumstances. Consequently, it can be disheartening to navigate through this vast sea of information, unsure of whether there is any actionable recourse to effect meaningful change or simply traverse the challenges that inevitably arise from the actions of our influential elite. In light of these circumstances, we may even be compelled to reluctantly accept the notion that our fate is ultimately doomed.
Fantastic lecture! I recently read Wells’s World Brain and posted some thoughts from a different angle. Not claiming to be in Cynthia’s whatsoever but just thought I’d share here. Feel free to post any thoughts, criticisms.
https://substack.com/profile/130537795-chris-youngblood/note/p-133101419?r=25pvlv&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Cynthia Chung's writings are very informative and seem well documented. But speaking of modern Ukrainian history, it would behoove her to investigate the case of Mykola Skrypnyk, ethnically Ukrainian and one of the Old Bolshevik communists, right there with Lenin and Stalin. And what happened to him and his regime in Ukraine in the early 1930s.---Skrypnyk wanted to establish a genuinely Ukrainian communist regime, state, and favored that the USSR be a federation rather than strictly centrally controlled. However, there was a resurgence of Russian supremacists led largely by Pavel Postyshev, who convinced Stalin that there was such a thing as dangerous Ukrainian "bourgeois nationalism"---the result being that there was a huge pogrom of communists with Ukrainian identity. Ukrainian language and culture were ferociously persecuted. The supremacy of Russian language and culture was established in the USSR. Along with this came the now well-known famine targeting the rural Ukrainian-identity population at large. This famine was actually part of an overall depopulation program imposed on Ukraine and parts of Russia and we think central Asia. It was the policy of what we would call the nonhuman antihuman "depopulation collective" who insisted that payment for the industrialization by "machines that make machines" had to be in grain, nothing else, not gold like Stalin originally offered. So this brought about collectivization and payment by making people die, starve in great numbers.---We maintain that if this had not happened, it is very likely that Bandera and his group would not have become fascists but would have joined Skrypnyk in building up Ukraine and would have been devoutly anti-fascist communists of Ukrainian identity. The policy of the German fascists was to allow some expression of Ukrainian identity, where the Soviet policy was no such thing, all had to be strictly Russian supremacy.---Now let's make things clear, after reading the section on Hitler in "Lightning and the Sun" by his ardent disciple so-called Savitri Devi, it became clear that Hitler's movement was actually a very extreme bizarre environmentalist movement whose ultimate goal was to exterminate most of humankind except for some tiny number of extremely warlike so-called Nordics or Germanics, who would have likely killed each other off anyway, and the planet would have been left to the "noble and innocent" animals. And Hitler did promote animal rights, even as he viewed most humans as worthless.
So there it was, another manifestation of nonhuman antihuman intelligence as driving force., what might be called the "depopulation collective". But that end result was to be in the future. Hitler was captivated by the modern racist theories first raised by one Arthur de Gobineau who, however, was not anti-Semitic and therefore not quite fitting the desirable mold. But Gobineau was an initiator of the great fundamental enmity between the Germanic-Scandinavian people against the Slavonic people, much to the overall disaster for the White race.
Yes, yes, I've been pointing out Wells' "War of the Worlds"/ War of the Words, since early 2020.
The "Word" creates.....yada yada...all that.
I had the honour of narrating World Brain by Wells for Adultbrain.ca
It's on audible and everywhere else now. I feel like his world brain is more like Wikipedia and has fully arrived.
Such a fascinating time back in the early 1900's when they thought they knew so much about civilization and geo politics.
https://www.audible.com/pd/World-Brain-Audiobook/B0C6C47LD7?qid=1689533016&sr=1-1&ref=a_search_c3_lProduct_1_1&pf_rd_p=83218cca-c308-412f-bfcf-90198b687a2f&pf_rd_r=6RSXHNB4DH6KC7Z75CNN&pageLoadId=kOp3gpkAsN8SaV9C&creativeId=0d6f6720-f41c-457e-a42b-8c8dceb62f2c
You should become better acquainted with HG Wells https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/why-hg-wells-the-shape-of-things
It's still more nuanced... from what I remember, he would have agreed with us on some things. Free speech, debate, freedom of expression. I think he would be horrified with how bad censorship, and the internet has become. big tech, fake news, guerilla skeptics, scientism, coerced jabs etc. Unless he was lying in his non fiction books.
But of course I don't agree with most of what he/they stood for, especially when talking about "civilized" vs "savages"
Thanks. I've only read about 4 or 5 of his books.
"Middle Europe?" all part of the NWO... i thought you were in favour of 'nation states' and 'national banking' ...
Guy where are you getting "middle europe" from? And yes, I am for nation states and national banking.
"Middle Europe" is in the title to the presentation
Mitteleuropa is German for Central Europe. The Kernpunkte conference was for a primarily German speaking audience. Matt and myself were the only English speakers. It is like specifying between Western Europe and Eastern Europe, which tend to differ greatly in cultures and politics. Or specifying between North, Central and South America.
... unfortunately i cannot attach a screenshot however "Middle Europe" is in english on the opening screen to this presentation - "Middle Europe" 'fits' between "Eastern Europe" and "Western Europe" - your argument is 'sound'
Yes, as I said the conference was a German conference and Kirsten the founder of Kernpunkte speaks in broken English and was the one who translated the poster into English, so she wrote middle instead of central but if you read the original German underneath it is clear what she meant to write, she wrote "mitteleuropa" which again is German for central europe. Instead of continuing on this very lazy line of inquiry, how about you actually look into Kernpunkte or the contents of the actual presentation.
Richard there are not too many people on Earth. https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/what-determines-a-limit-to-growth
Maybe there's too many human imposters.